The discipline · The book · The living system
A technical decision framework for the 0→1 journey in the AI era.
Building from 0→1 is not one software project. It is a sequence of hypotheses that have to earn the next engineering commitment. Startup Engineering helps founders and CTOs decide what deserves to be built, how much engineering the current evidence has earned, and what can safely wait.
Conventional engineering optimizes for scale, reliability and elegance — the right criteria for a validated system. Between 0 and 1 the startup is still validating its problem, solution, product, market and fit. So the engineering bar is set by the current loop's evidence, not by the industry.
A startup is not one project plan. It is five evidence loops. Each is named for what it exists to discover — and in each you hold something tangible as the tool of discovery.
At every loop the quality bar is set by one question: what must this thing be for the loop's evidence to be readable? Anything less blocks the discovery; anything more is payload. The answers are a ladder.
The concrete technical decisions of 0→1, organized by the loop where each one becomes real — and titled as the questions actually asked.
Every decision is worked the same way, in six parts. The second — the determining questions — is always the load-bearing one.
Stated plainly, as the question you actually ask.
The three to five questions that actually settle it.
The options, with honest, dated costs.
My judgment — and the conditions under which I'd do differently.
Where this guidance explicitly doesn't apply.
The executable version, to run on your specifics.
Executable versions of the decisions. Each skill is a plain text file you hand to Claude or ChatGPT. The assistant interviews you through that decision's determining questions, on your specifics, and gives you the recommendation plainly, with conditions.
Get the skills
The book holds what doesn't change: the Five Loops, their exit bars, the Engineering Ladder, and 17 decisions worked in six parts. This site keeps it current and executable.
Explore the bookResearch. Supporting technical depth — evaluated engineering patterns, architectures and frameworks. Open the research archive →
I wrote Startup Engineering because most technical advice silently assumes a validated business. Between 0 and 1, nothing is validated yet — and I've made these mistakes personally.
Some decisions need a human with scars in the room. That's what I do → selvaganapathy.io